P. Clay Sherrod Jun 25, 2013
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Gray" <pluto@...>
To: <guide-user@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: [guide-user] Representations of heaven more attractive in guide 9. For
when will that be?
> On 06/25/2013 10:22 AM, Stephen Tonkin wrote:
>> I concur with Pierre. I would far rather have planetarium software that
>> is clean and extremely functional than that which is pseudo-realistic.
>
> I've added in a little bit of "pseudo-realism", but almost entirely
> in the interest of function. For example, the "realistic" sky (Display,
> Background, Realistic) is something I use to give a quick idea as to
> how dark the sky might be for a particular observation. The objects
> around the horizon (Display, Background, Horizon Objects) helps
> me avoid the blunder of thinking I'm going to see an event that will
> actually happen below the horizon. (And if I see a rocket ship on
> the horizon, I know I'm "observing" from the moon.)
>
> Some people have modified the horizon and horizon objects to show
> what's actually seen from their observing location. This is a bit
> of a pain (you have to figure out what the limiting altitude above
> the horizon is for a series of points around the horizon), but it
> can and has been done. You can then also move/add things around
> ("there's a house to the south-southeast; put a dead tree over
> here, and a live tree here, and a streetlight here.") This is
> documented at the bottom of the file 'horizon.dat'.
>
> -- Bill
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an empty email to:
> guide-user-unsubscribe@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>