Re: Representations of heaven more attractive in guide 9. For when will that be?

pastorgalactico Jun 25, 2013

Hello;
The improvement in vision camviar deveria be without representation esacta that I like in guide 9.
For example you could camviar the most realistic representation of the horizon and that could put the horizonde representation of each has in his observatory.
It would be a plus for those who choose estelarium or starry nigh by the way they look and would see the guide asin not so spartan.
If these improvements would harm other functions guide 9 For now I keep the guide in September as it is.

Greetings;

J.Tapioles



--- In guide-user@yahoogroups.com, Pierre Laporte <solideogloria@...> wrote:
>
> From my point of view, I don't see the necessity to have gGuide present a
> more realistic view of the sky. I really prefer the schematic, clean design
> of the present view. It is more helpfull to locate objects in the sky
> chart. GUIDE is allready, from my perspective, the best astronomical
> sofware ever since produce.... beating Starry Night, Stellarium, and The Sky
> X..... I used it almost daily since the Version Guide 3.0...............
>
>
>
> And I alway appreciate the many improvements that Bill Gray since so many
> years............
>
>
>
> THANK YOU Bill
>
>
>
> Pierre Laporte
>
> C.O.A.M.N.D.
>
> Centre d'Observation Astronomique Des Monts Notre-Dame
>
> Québec, CANADA
>
>
>
> _____
>
> De : guide-user@yahoogroups.com [mailto:guide-user@yahoogroups.com] De la
> part de pastorgalactico
> Envoyé : 25 juin 2013 08:40
> À : guide-user@yahoogroups.com
> Objet : [guide-user] Representations of heaven more attractive in guide 9.
> For when will that be?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Does some point you could see in the sky guide September representations as
> slick as they look at the Estelarium or Starry Night?
> Are there any projects underway for that camvio?
> If the guide 9 could show these views and would be the best planetary
> informatic without any doubt.
>
> Greetings;
>
> J.Tapioles
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>