Bill,

> My guess would be that it may have been there since Guide 1.0.
> Strange it didn't get caught before!

Or since the "(2011 Mar 2) Constellation boundary fixes
<http://projectpluto.com/update8.htm#constell>"? :-)

--
Best Regards,
Stephen Tonkin

On 07/11/11 18:19, Bill J Gray wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Stephen Tonkin wrote:
> > I have discovered that here is a region of Pegasus (around Dec +11*)
> > that the legend reports as being Pisces. (13 Aug 2011 version)
>
> Thank you; this is a very definite bug.
>
> I was about to ask for more specific coordinates, but didn't have
> to; a bit of mousing around showed that the entire stripe between
> about dec +11 and +13 through Pegasus was mislabelled Pisces. And
> a stripe between about dec +29 to +32 going through Pegasus was
> mislabelled Andromeda, and a stripe in Octans from decs -83 to -75
> was mislabelled as Hydrus. The thing these areas have in common is
> that the eastern constellation boundary runs along RA=0 in B1875
> coordinates (the system in which constellation boundaries are
> defined.)
>
> Once I saw that, I was able to fix the bug.
>
> My guess would be that it may have been there since Guide 1.0.
> Strange it didn't get caught before!
>
> -- Bill
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]