toadatrix Jun 1, 2004
--- In guide-user@yahoogroups.com, "sc285" <rob515@k...> wrote:
> I placed in the files section of the group, the Goffin Planetary
chart
> which gives general information and locator charts. Steve Preston
> maintains the IOTA Asteroid occultations, and his website is
located
> at: http://www.asteroidoccultation.com/
> Since astrometry closer to the event can actually shift the path,
the
> article in S&T gives general information, but that can change.
>
> Incidently there is a NEW version of the Tycho2 catalog for Occult.
>
> Denis V. Denissenko wrote:
> "The cause of problem was identified - wrong order of stars in
several
> regions in Tycho2.dat. To make long story short, stars *were*
there,
> but WinOccult was *not* finding them because they were not at their
> places.
>
> I have completely rearranged Tycho2.dat in the correct order and
also
> recompiled tycho2.inx file. There are still all the same 3375961
stars,
> but now WinOccult is finding by 3-3.5 per cent more occultations!
> Especially in Gemini, Auriga and Taurus between declinations of
> +23.5..+24, +24.5..+25. +26.5..+27, +29.5..+30 and in Capricornus
and
> Aquarius at -2..-2.5 and -5..-5.5 bands. These are the results of
my
> test with occultations of stars brighter than 10.5m in 2005.
>
> The fixed version of Tycho2.dat and tycho2.inx is uploaded at
> http://hea.iki.rssi.ru/~denis/TychoNew.zip (64.264.832 Bytes, or
62758
> kB). Perhaps it will be desirable to upload the replacement at
IOTA ftp
> site after additional testing by Dave Herald and one or two
> calculators. If you have some downloading software like Download
Master
> or something like that, please use it rather than simple "Save as"
from
> your browser. File is too large, so it might take several
attempts."
>
> David Herald (author of Occult) wrote:
>
> I'm very happy to advise that I have now done a series of checks
on the
> files that Denis has re-created, and they are fine.
>
> Denis - thanks for the great work in fixing up this bug.
>
> Rob - can you upload the files from Denis' site, and put them on
the IOTA
> site with some explanatory notes. Main guidance - the new files
> required are
> Tycho2.dat, Tycho2.inx, and HipparcosIndex.dat - and these simply
replace
> the existing files of that name in the StarCats directory.
>
> Dave H
>
> The file is also located at the IOTA FTP site:
> ftp://lunar-occultations.com/pub/
>
> More detailed information can be found on the Occult Yahoo
discussion
> group archive located at:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/occult-software/
>
>
> Rob Robinson
> VP of IOTA Occultation Services
>
>
>
> --- In guide-user@yahoogroups.com, "toadatrix" <jsnyder@w...>
wrote:
> > I discovered that for some reason, I don't know why, the Tycho 2
> > star 5244-0017 is not in the Tycho 2 catalog supplied with
Occult.
> > It is in Guide8 so I used the Guide8 position of it and added it
to
> > Occult. I then recomputed the occultation using Occult and the
> > reported times and occultation path are similar to, but not
exactly
> > the same as, those shown by Guide8. Both Guide8 and Occult show
> > paths for this event that are well to the north and west of the
path
> > shown in the March, 2004 Sky & Telescope.
> >
> > --- In guide-user@yahoogroups.com, "toadatrix" <jsnyder@w...>
wrote:
> > > According to the March, 2004 issue of Sky & Telescope (page
103,
> > > 106) the asteroid 107 Camilla will occultate the 11.8
magnitude
> > star
> > > TYC 5244 0017 on Sept. 5, 2004 at around 9h UT. The map shown
on
> > > page 103 shows the central path passing over the southern part
of
> > > Wisconsin where I live. I calculated the same event in Guide
8b
> > and
> > > found the central path missing southern Wisconsin all together
and
> > > passing, instead, over the north west corner of Wisconsin.
> > >
> > > Since Guide has always been dead on accurate for me I have to
ask
> > > what accounts for the difference and which prediction (if any)
may
> > > be correct? I should mention that I also tried to find this
event
> > > with the latest version of Occult and I couldn't find it at
all
> > > (that was really surprising). Is there a way to get the
latest
> > > information into Guide so as to get the most accurate
> > predictions?
> > > Where would I go on the web to get that latest information?
> > Thanks.