RE: [guide-user] Re: Mechanical error correction for scopes

Fr. Pat Madden Dec 18, 2002

I use "brand x" (a.k.a. "TheSky) to control my telescope because it integrates with TPoint. I use Guide for everything else because I find it so intuitive, and the display is so easy to customize to match whatever the viewing conditions are. (Also integration with RealSky--I could go on and on, but why preach to the choir?) I would have to re-think my operating procedure if Guide became compatible with TPoint!
Pat Madden

-----Original Message-----
From: Josch Hambsch <hambsch@...> [mailto:hambsch@...]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:31 PM
To: guide-user@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [guide-user] Re: Mechanical error correction for scopes


Bill,

that's good news. I have seen The Sky and TPoint at a fellow
astronomers observatory and I was very much impressed about the
software. However, it only works with The Sky.
A similar solution for Guide would make Guide even more competitive
for users with robotic telescopes and slight misalignment of the
mount.
I much better like Guide for the intuitive user interface compared to
The Sky.

Looking forward to e new version including a similar software as
TPoint.

Regards, Josch


--- In guide-user@yahoogroups.com, Bill J Gray <pluto@p...> wrote:
> Hi Josch,
>
> This will be a two-part job.
>
> First part will be to straighten out the "spaghetti code"
currently
> controlling scopes so that I can work on one thing without (usually)
> breaking three others. That will take me a while... once I've done
> that, though, I'll post a "test update" that will not contain
much in
> the way of blatantly-obvious new features; it will be really just a
> _test_ to ensure that the revised system works.
>
> Then I get into the fun part. Patrick Wallace, the author of
TPoint,
> has an excellent page on the subject of the theory underlying
TPoint:
>
> http://www.tpsoft.demon.co.uk/pointing.htm
>
> As it turns out, TPoint and MEC are just about mathematically
> equivalent (not surprising; we looked at the same piece of physics
> and derived the same mathematics). However, Wallace's discussion
> of it made me realize that I had made the entire process more
> awkward than it really had to be, and has given me some good
> ideas for making the whole process much simpler. I'm really looking
> forward to re-tackling this problem, now that I have a much better
> grasp of what's _really_ going on here.
>
> -- Bill



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=240537.2671416.4133191.1925585/D=egroupweb/S=1705043464:HM/A=1368547/R=0/*http://shop.store.yahoo.com/cgi-bin/clink?netflix2+shopping:dmad/M=240537.2671416.4133191.1925585/D=egroupweb/S=1705043464:HM/A=1368547/R=1/1040236258+http://us.rmi.yahoo.com/rmi/http://www.netflix.com/rmi-framed-url/http://www.netflix.com/Default%3Fmqso=60156050>
<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=240537.2671416.4133191.1925585/D=egroupmail/S=:HM/A=1368547/rand=820372613>

To unsubscribe from this group, send an empty email to:
guide-user-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]