Re: new version automatic vaisala

Tomas Feb 28, 2012

Hi Bill,
I see this happening with many automatic Vaisala, esp when I try
manually linking two nights of observations to check if my recovery
efforts were successful. Here are some examples (formatted text: http://iasc.scibuff.com/find_orb.txt)


K12D28B IC2012 02 25.26487810 43 18.391+11 01 21.28 20.6 R 695
K12D28B KC2012 02 25.28173610 43 17.462+11 01 25.73 21.0 R 695
K12D28B KC2012 02 25.29847810 43 16.487+11 01 28.53 20.0 R 695
K12D28B KC2012 02 27.27392910 41 32.494+11 07 55.43 20.9 R 695
K12D28B KC2012 02 27.29075810 41 31.585+11 07 58.77 20.7 R 695
K12D28B KC2012 02 27.30557310 41 30.811+11 08 01.84 20.4 R 695

12 02 25.264878 695 10 43 18.391 +11 01 21.28 .38- .47- .54953 1.5387
12 02 25.281736 695 10 43 17.462 +11 01 25.73 .25+ .53+ .54950 1.5387
12 02 25.298478 695 10 43 16.487 +11 01 28.53 .15+ .05- .54948 1.5386
12 02 27.273929 695 10 41 32.494 +11 07 55.43 1.3- .08- .54719 1.5371
12 02 27.290758 695 10 41 31.585 +11 07 58.77 .10- .05- .54718 1.5371
12 02 27.305573 695 10 41 30.811 +11 08 01.84 1.3+ .13+ .54716 1.5371


K12D28B elements: http://is.gd/TnonQw


K12D27Z C2012 02 23.28841 10 27 13.80 +08 17 02.8 20.4 V G84
K12D27Z C2012 02 23.30987 10 27 12.81 +08 17 11.9 20.2 V G84
K12D27Z C2012 02 23.33075 10 27 11.90 +08 17 20.4 20.1 V G84
K12D27Z KC2012 02 25.26914910 25 47.395+08 30 39.76 20.4 R 695
K12D27Z KC2012 02 25.28601310 25 46.573+08 30 46.91 20.2 R 695
K12D27Z KC2012 02 25.30274310 25 45.837+08 30 54.15 20.2 R 695

12 02 23.28841 G84 10 27 13.80 +08 17 02.8 .94- .17- .65196 1.6411
12 02 23.30987 G84 10 27 12.81 +08 17 11.9 .25- .11+ .65193 1.6411
12 02 23.33075 G84 10 27 11.90 +08 17 20.4 1.2+ .06+ .65191 1.6410
12 02 25.269149 695 10 25 47.395 +08 30 39.76 .36- .17- .64992 1.6396
12 02 25.286013 695 10 25 46.573 +08 30 46.91 .41- .06- .64990 1.6396
12 02 25.302743 695 10 25 45.837 +08 30 54.15 .74+ .22+ .64989 1.6396


K12D27Z elements: http://is.gd/40wB32


12SF27 KC2012 02 24.24171309 49 18.629-01 21 54.42 20.6 R 695
12SF27 KC2012 02 24.25629109 49 17.986-01 21 51.03 21.1 R 695
12SF27 KC2012 02 24.27110509 49 17.333-01 21 46.69 20.9 R 695
12SF27 KC2012 02 25.19781809 48 36.630-01 17 27.12 20.6 R 695
12SF27 KC2012 02 25.21251709 48 35.963-01 17 23.01 20.5 R 695
12SF27 KC2012 02 25.22730309 48 35.299-01 17 18.67 20.4 R 695

12 02 24.241713 695 09 49 18.629 -01 21 54.42 1.5- .27+ .47900 1.4583
12 02 24.256291 695 09 49 17.986 -01 21 51.03 .01+ .29- .47900 1.4583
12 02 24.271105 695 09 49 17.333 -01 21 46.69 1.6+ .02+ .47899 1.4583
12 02 25.197818 695 09 48 36.630 -01 17 27.12 .96- .04+ .47889 1.4578
12 02 25.212517 695 09 48 35.963 -01 17 23.01 .08- .06- .47889 1.4578
12 02 25.227303 695 09 48 35.299 -01 17 18.67 .96+ .03+ .47888 1.4578



Here's 3rd night for 12SF27

12SF27 *KC2012 02 17.33014009 54 29.27 -01 51 48.7 20.2 V H21
12SF27 KC2012 02 17.34224309 54 28.74 -01 51 45.8 19.8 V H21
12SF27 KC2012 02 17.36241809 54 27.80 -01 51 40.9 20.2 V H21

--- In find_orb@yahoogroups.com, Bill J Gray <pluto@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Tomas,
>
> Sounds very strange indeed... could you please post on-list
> or e-mail to me the observations that caused this to happen?
>
> I did make changes to the way in which initial orbit determination
> works, but it ought to be _better_, not weirder and worse!
>
> -- Bill
>